International Journal of Preventive and Clinical Dental Research

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2018  |  Volume : 5  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 45--49

Comparative study of remineralization potential of three different remineralizing agents on demineralized enamel using light fluorescence and confocal fluorescence microscope: An in vitro study


Trishagni Chaudhury1, S Ananthakrishna2, R Veena Kumari3, Sukhbir Kour1, Aswathi Syam1 
1 Postgraduate Student, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.R. Ambedkar Dental College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
2 Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.R. Ambedkar Dental College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
3 Professor and Head of the Deparment, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.R. Ambedkar Dental College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Trishagni Chaudhury
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.R. Ambedkar Dental College and Hospital, 1/32 Cline Road, Cooke Town, Bengaluru - 560 005, Karnataka
India

Aim and Objective: The main objective of this in vitro study was to evaluate the comparative analysis of remineralization potential of three different materials – casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate with fluoride (CPP-ACPF), calcium sucrose phosphate (CaSP), and bioactive glass on demineralized enamel using light fluorescence microscopy and confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 single-rooted maxillary and mandibular premolars were selected; 4 mm × 4 mm window was prepared on the buccal surfaces of the teeth, which was then subjected to demineralization for 96 h at 37°C. Teeth were randomly selected and divided into four study groups of 10 teeth each: Group 1 (artificial saliva), Group 2 (CPP-ACPF), Group 3 (bioactive glass), and Group 4 (CaSP). Each group was treated with respective remineralizing agents and sectioned with Struers Minitom diamond saw. Each section obtained was visualized under light fluorescence microscope for detection of remineralized and demineralized zones and also was visualized under confocal laser scanning fluorescent microscope for the quantification of demineralized and remineralized zones. Statistical Analysis: Statistical analysis was done using paired t-test, followed by one-way ANOVA, where P ≤ 0.05. Results: All the groups showed better statistically significant remineralization potential when compared to the control group, but among them Group 4, that is, Toothmin group showed the highest mean remineralized value, followed by Groups 3, 2, and 1, though the values were not statistically significant (P ≤ 0.05). Light fluorescence microscopy was an efficient diagnostic aid in detecting remineralization and demineralization. Conclusion: CaSP (Toothmin) has got the best remineralization potential when compared to other groups.


How to cite this article:
Chaudhury T, Ananthakrishna S, Kumari R V, Kour S, Syam A. Comparative study of remineralization potential of three different remineralizing agents on demineralized enamel using light fluorescence and confocal fluorescence microscope: An in vitro study.Int J Prev Clin Dent Res 2018;5:45-49


How to cite this URL:
Chaudhury T, Ananthakrishna S, Kumari R V, Kour S, Syam A. Comparative study of remineralization potential of three different remineralizing agents on demineralized enamel using light fluorescence and confocal fluorescence microscope: An in vitro study. Int J Prev Clin Dent Res [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Dec 6 ];5:45-49
Available from: http://www.ijpcdr.org/article.asp?issn=2349-7319;year=2018;volume=5;issue=4;spage=45;epage=49;aulast=Chaudhury;type=0