|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 8-10
Comparative evaluation of biofilm formation among three differently treated surface on titanium samples
R Arun1, Nikhil S Rajan2, Nissy Elizabeth George3, TK Chandrathara2, R Hari Krishnan4, S Gayathri5
1 Reader, Department of Prosthodontcs, Noorul Islam College Of Dental Science, Neyyatinkara, Kerala, India
2 Reader, Department of Prosthodontics, Sri Sankara Dental College, Akathumuri, Varkala, Kerala, India
3 Senior Lecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Sri Sankara Dental College, Akathumuri, Varkala, Kerala, India
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics, PMS College of Dental Science And Research, Vattapara, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
5 Senior Lecturer, Department of Periodontics And Oral Implantology, PMS College of Dental Science And Research, Vattapara, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
|Date of Submission||25-Nov-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||27-Nov-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||13-Jan-2020|
Department of Prosthodontics, Noorul Islam College of Dental Science, Neyyatinkara, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Use of osseointegrated oral implants has been an excellent method for replacement of missing teeth. Biofilm formation on oral implants can cause inflammation of peri-implant tissues, which can affect the long-term success of osseointegrated implants.
Aims and Objectives: Comparative evaluation of biofilm formation among three differently treated surface on titanium samples
Methodology: Samples were blasted and later loaded with gentamicin drug by vacuum drying and evaluation of the strains was done for biofilm. Bacterial adhesion was evaluated on time intervals of 0 h, 1 h, 4 h 24 h, and 48 h.
Results: Bacterial adhesion was sequentially increasing in polished samples. Initial bacterial adhesion was more on surface modified samples when compared to polished samples in the 1st h. Bacterial adhesion was retarded in gentamicin-coated hydroxyapatite (HA)-blasted samples up to 24 h. Bacterial adhesion was considerably less on TiO2-blasted samples up to 48 h.
Conclusion: Implant surface modified with TiO2and gentamicin showed delayed biofilm formation even up to 48 h. Surface modification with HA has gained considerable osteoconductive surface which is a boon for the production of future implants with less expense; however, further studies are to be carried out to prove its efficacy.
Keywords: Biofilm, dental implants, gentamicin, titanium alloy samples
|How to cite this article:|
Arun R, Rajan NS, George NE, Chandrathara T K, Krishnan R H, Gayathri S. Comparative evaluation of biofilm formation among three differently treated surface on titanium samples. Int J Prev Clin Dent Res 2020;7:8-10
|How to cite this URL:|
Arun R, Rajan NS, George NE, Chandrathara T K, Krishnan R H, Gayathri S. Comparative evaluation of biofilm formation among three differently treated surface on titanium samples. Int J Prev Clin Dent Res [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 14];7:8-10. Available from: http://www.ijpcdr.org/text.asp?2020/7/1/8/275691
| Introduction|| |
The use of dental implants has become a routine procedure in dentistry to replace one or more missing teeth. However, there is also evidence of chronic inflammation, in the range of 8.6%–9.7%, in soft- and hard-tissue neighboring implants, and is commonly observed about 10 years after implantation. These pathologic conditions termed “mucositis” and “peri-implantitis,” are considered major complications in dental implantology. Antibiotic-loaded implant coatings are employed for the prevention of implant-associated infections. Gentamicin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic used to treat many types of bacterial infection. It is active against wide range of bacterial infection mostly Gram-negative bacteria such as the Pseudomonas and Proteus and Gram-positive bacteria such as Streptococcus and Staphylococcus. Hence, this study is a novel approach to evaluate the influence of biofilm formation on surface-modified implants with and without coating of gentamicin.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the biofilm formation on gentamicin-treated implants.
Comparative evaluation of biofilm formation among three differently gentamicin-treated surface on titanium samples.
| Methodology|| |
Commercially available Ti6Al4V (ASTMF11O8, MANHER METAL SUPPLY CORPORATION, Mumbai, India) was machined to 2 mm thickness and 2 cm × 1.5 cm length and breadth rectangular samples. These discs were mechanically polished by silicon carbide papers of grit size 240 and 600 in the grinder and polisher. Hydroxyapatite (HA) powder was prepared in house by a wet precipitation technique using (No3)2-4H2O (calcium nitrate) and NH4H2 PO4 (ammonium dihydrogen phosphate. Each sample was blasted for 2, 4, and 6 min. Five samples of each particle size, distance, and time was blasted. The same procedure was carried out for TiO2 also. The samples were vacuumed for 15 min at 200 mbar. Titanium samples (5 samples of each group) were transferred into Eppendorf tubes containing 1 ml Streptococcus sanguis cultures. Bacterial concentration was about 109 ufc/ml. They were incubated for 0, 1, 4, 24, and 48 h at 37°C. The viable count was plotted against roughness and plain samples.
| Results|| |
Data were analyzed by SPSS software 16.0 version. Analysis of variance was applied for comparing between the groups. Post hoc test followed by Dunnet t-test was used to find the significant difference at 95% confidence interval. P < 0.05 between the groups considered statistically significant. [Table 1] shows number of viable organisms in plain polished titanium + gentamicin. [Table 2] shows number of viable organisms in HA blasted and [Table 3] shows number of viable organisms in TiO2.
|Table 1: Number of viable organisms in plain polished titanium + gentamicin|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Gentamicin loaded on TiO2 surface showed low concentrations of biofilm formation among all the other groups. The success rates obtained with dental implants depend on the volume and quality of the bone. It is often difficult to obtain implant anchorage when the density of bone is less. A S. sanguis strain was used to evaluate the biofilm formation since Streptococcus was the predominant initial colonizing microbes., The SEM analysis and EDAX report of samples showed surface roughness and sufficiently adhered elements calcium and phosphorous on HA-blasted samples. The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results showed surface that gentamicin loaded on TiO2 surface showed low concentrations of biofilm formation among all the other groups. It is noticed within 1 h biofilm formation was on plain polished surface. However, biofilm formation was delayed more than 1 h on plain polished gentamicin-loaded samples. In contrast, the biofilm formation was delayed on TiO2-blasted surface even up to 48 h. In contrast, in HA-treated implants, it was delayed only up to 4 h.
| Conclusion|| |
It can be concluded that implant surface-modified gentamicin showed delayed biofilm formation even up to 48 h. These implants can retard the plaque formation thus prevents peri-implantitis in the primary healing stage. This, in turn, can prevent the failure of implants. This is ideal in situ ations where the patient is having poor bone quality, poor oral hygiene, and in patients suffering from debilitating disease. Surface modification with HA has gained considerable osteoconductive surface which is a boon for the production of future implants with less expense; however, further studies are to be carried out to prove its efficacy.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Brett PM, Harle J, Salih V, Mihoc R, Olsen I, Jones FH, et al
. Roughness response genes in osteoblasts. Bone 2004;35:124-33.
Ivanoff CJ, Hallgren C, Widmark G, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of the bone integration of TiO (2) blasted and turned titanium microimplants in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:128-34.
Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Engquist E, Feldmann H, Gröndahl K. Astra Tech and brånemark system implants: A prospective 5-year comparative study. Results after one year. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999;1:17-26.
Dige I, Nyengaard JR, Kilian M, Nyvad B. Application of stereological principles for quantification of bacteria in intact dental biofilms. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2009;24:69-75.
Lee KH, Maiden MF, Tanner AC, Weber HP. Microbiota of successful osseointegrated dental implants. J Periodontol 1999;70:131-8.
Auschill TM, Hellwig E, Sculean A, Hein N, Arweiler NB. Impact of the intraoral location on the rate of biofilm growth. Clin Oral Investig 2004;8:97-101.
de Groot K, Wolke JG, Jansen JA. Calcium phosphate coatings for medical implants. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 1998;212:137-47.
Slack R, Tindall A, Shetty AA, James KD, Rand C. 15-year follow-up results of the hydroxyapatite ceramic-coated femoral stem. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2006;14:151-4.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]